On Saturday, 20 September 2014 at 08:38:49 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Perhaps this new situation (no implicit conversions, plus two kinds of casts, and few extra literals) is safer than the current D situation (and I think no C code gains a new working meaning in this new situation).

He want go-semantics. It also means that literals are untyped until bound, so you can do high precision calculations at compile time.

I would also like to see these explicit conversions (and find hacks like "alias this" somewhat annoying).

I also think arithmetics on ubytes should be done as ubytes etc to allow SIMD vectorization.

Go semantics is described well here:

http://blog.golang.org/constants

Reply via email to