On 12/21/2014 2:06 AM, Dicebot wrote:
No, it is exactly the other way around. The very point of what I am saying is that you DOESN'T CARE about ownership as long as worst case scenario is assumed. I have zero idea why you identify it is conflating as ownership when it is explicitly designed to be distinct.
The point of transitive scoping would be if the root owned the data reachable through the root.
