Am Thu, 08 Jan 2015 07:44:17 -0800 schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org>:
> On 1/8/15 4:46 AM, aldanor wrote: > > On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 07:09:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu > > wrote: > >> http://dlang.org/library/std/digest/digest/digest.html > >> > >> Ugh. -- Andrei > > > > This thread needs more digest: > > > > http://dlang.org/library/std/digest/digest/digest.digest.html > > Heh. Alright, any lieutenant who could get on this? > > There's a sense of urgency - these pages are live now. > > > Andrei > What kind of action would you expect? Renaming a name which has been used for two years now without complaints, simply because it looks bad in the new documentation? As we usually don't rename functions with inconsistent naming or otherwise bad names because of backwards compatibility (TM) I guess that's not what you want. OTOH I'm not sure if ddox could be much improved in this regard. Maybe it shouldn't display the full name, only Class.member. But I don't really know what you expect.
