On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 10:50:10AM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 1/8/15 9:16 AM, Kiith-Sa wrote: > > > >This is a problem with naming, not with DDox. It would look bad > >regardless of generator, or regardless of documentation at all. You > >could make it look slightly less bad, but you might end up hurting > >other documentation. (I'm not implying it should be renamed (bad > >reason for breaking compatibility), but I see no point in changing > >doc generation just because of some bad naming.) > > Sigh. No matter how I look at it, the same name repeated FOUR times > only evokes Java's factory factory etc. -- Andrei
Yes, good ole Java verbosity with class Chocolate, class ChocolateFactory, class ChocolateFactoryFactory, class ChocolateWrapper, class ChocolateWrapperFactory, class ChocolateWrapperFactoryFactoryWrapper, ad nauseaum. Utterly delicious. </sarcasm> :-P T -- It won't be covered in the book. The source code has to be useful for something, after all. -- Larry Wall
