On 1/8/15 9:16 AM, Kiith-Sa wrote:
This is a problem with naming, not with DDox. It would look bad regardless of generator, or regardless of documentation at all. You could make it look slightly less bad, but you might end up hurting other documentation. (I'm not implying it should be renamed (bad reason for breaking compatibility), but I see no point in changing doc generation just because of some bad naming.)
Sigh. No matter how I look at it, the same name repeated FOUR times only evokes Java's factory factory etc. -- Andrei
