On 4/7/15 3:34 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 18:01:53 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 4/7/15 2:16 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 08:58:57 UTC, ixid wrote:
Or to be more consistent with UFCS:

foreach (name; names.parallel) {
   name.writeln;
}

no.please

wat

unreadable.is.ufcs.using.over

Yes, I don't like "writeln" being used with UFCS, it's an abuse.

My point is that every language has WATs :-)

Reply via email to