On 4/7/15 3:34 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 18:01:53 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:On 4/7/15 2:16 PM, deadalnix wrote:On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 08:58:57 UTC, ixid wrote:Or to be more consistent with UFCS:foreach (name; names.parallel) { name.writeln; }no.pleasewatunreadable.is.ufcs.using.over
Yes, I don't like "writeln" being used with UFCS, it's an abuse. My point is that every language has WATs :-)
