On Wednesday, 13 May 2015 at 09:52:08 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 13/05/15 12:29, Maxim Fomin wrote:
Giving how D is similar to C/C++ I am surprised that
non-familiriarity
with D is a big problem.
D is a fairly complex language (far too complex, IMHO, relative
to its age). Its complexities are both different than C++, and
also of a different kind.
I would not say to anyone that they can learn D quickly because
they know C++ (not to mention that the average knowledge of C++
is extremely low).
Shachar
I find it easy to spot D code written by a C++ or Java developer
by the heavy overuse of OO-based design, little to no range based
code/afraid of being functional, and in the case of Java - heavy
abuse of the GC.
