On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:16:49 +0000, Namespace wrote: > On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 12:21:23 UTC, ketmar wrote: >> On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:50:15 +0000, Namespace wrote: >> >>> For me it looks ugly. But I would prefer final(false) instead of >>> !final. >> >> this opens a can of worms. should this be accepted too: >> enum doItFinal = false; >> final(doItFinal) >> ? >> >> or even >> final(someFunnyTemplate!(with_, args, andOtherTemplate!"too")) >> ? > > Yes, please.
no, please. that's terrible, that's unpredictable, that's undebugable, that's slow. "we can make it dynamic" is not a good reason to actually make something dynamic.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
