On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 13:39:54 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:16:49 +0000, Namespace wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 12:21:23 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:50:15 +0000, Namespace wrote:
For me it looks ugly. But I would prefer final(false)
instead of
!final.
this opens a can of worms. should this be accepted too:
enum doItFinal = false;
final(doItFinal)
?
or even
final(someFunnyTemplate!(with_, args,
andOtherTemplate!"too"))
?
Yes, please.
no, please. that's terrible, that's unpredictable, that's
undebugable,
that's slow. "we can make it dynamic" is not a good reason to
actually
make something dynamic.
So you dislike noexcept(condition) from C++? I like it. But no
matter which syntax comes, important is that we get something to
revert attributes. :)
