On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 18:49:09 +0200, Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 06/02/15 14:21, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:50:15 +0000, Namespace wrote: >> >>> For me it looks ugly. But I would prefer final(false) instead of >>> !final. >> >> this opens a can of worms. should this be accepted too: >> enum doItFinal = false; >> final(doItFinal) >> ? >> >> or even >> final(someFunnyTemplate!(with_, args, andOtherTemplate!"too")) >> ? > > [I'd assumed it was a rhetorical question, but after reading > some of the followups...] > > Of course.
this is bad. it smells. it adds almost nothing in terms of uniformity. and i'm sure that Hackerpilot will be happy to know that he now needs a full-blown D interpreter to determine if some method is virtual or not. ;- )
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
