On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 05:23:25 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:40:01 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
Any idea how far away it might be from being something that
someone could use in an enterprise environment simply, in the
same kind of way that vibed is easy? I appreciate that
making it broadly usable may not be what interests you, and
may be a project for someone else.
I would say 3 months. So it'll probably be a year considering
how off my last estimates were.
Etienne -
Interesting back story.
Will this be under a Boost licence ?
Will you provide a link ?
Even the vibe.d library was much more advanced than what I
could find with an open source license that allowed static
compilation at the time (1 yr 1/2 ago), so I went forward with
that and worked my way through.
[snip\]
So now I can build a full web application/server executable in
less than 2mb packed, and it runs faster than anything out
there. It's standalone, works cross-platform, etc.
Will you explain how it is different to Vibe.d ?
It has HTTP/2, a new encryption library, it uses a native TCP
event library, lots of refactoring. In short, the entire thing is
in D rather than linking with OpenSSL and libevent.
It's MIT licensed. I have it here:
https://github.com/etcimon/vibe.d
The dub.json uses relative paths though while I'm developing.
You're free to adjust the file and try it, we can consider it
stable.
