On 6/23/2015 4:49 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
IMHO, in this case, the "Lazy" suffix is a distracting technicality that doesn't carry its weight. Am I the only one?
Nope. For the reasons you mentioned.
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:32:55 -0700
On 6/23/2015 4:49 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
IMHO, in this case, the "Lazy" suffix is a distracting technicality that doesn't carry its weight. Am I the only one?
Nope. For the reasons you mentioned.