On 24/06/15 01:17, Meta wrote:
I really hate this naming scheme for functions that take lazy parameters. I still don't see why we don't do the (IMO) simplest and most intuitive thing and name them lazyToLower / lazyToUpper (or toLowerLazy / toUpperLazy). There is precedent with C#'s handling of async functions; for example, AccessTheWebAsync or GetStringAsync[1]. Your proposed naming scheme seems like it's trying to be too "clever" and really just ends up causing unnecessary confusion. This is not Ruby. [1]https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh191443.aspx
+1 -- /Jacob Carlborg
