Sönke is already on it.
http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.vibed/post/29110
i guess its not enough, there are still things that make vibe.d
slow.
i quickly tried
https://github.com/nanoant/WebFrameworkBenchmark.git
which is really a very simple benchmark but it shows about the
general overhead.
single core results against go-fasthttp with GOMAXPROCS=1 and
vibe distribution disabled on a c4.2xlarge ec2 instance
(archlinux):
vibe.d 0.7.23 with ldc
Requests/sec: 52102.06
vibe.d 0.7.26 with dmd
Requests/sec: 44438.47
vibe.d 0.7.26 with ldc
Requests/sec: 53996.62
go-fasthttp:
Requests/sec: 152573.32
go:
Requests/sec: 62310.04
its sad.
i am aware that go-fasthttp is a very simplistic, stripped down
webserver and vibe is almost a full blown framework. still it
should be D and vibe.d's USP to be faster than the fastest in the
world and not limping around at the end of the charts.
