V Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:32:08 +0000 yawniek via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> napsáno:
> >>> Sönke is already on it. > >>> > >>> http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.vibed/post/29110 > >>> > > i guess its not enough, there are still things that make vibe.d > slow. > > i quickly tried > https://github.com/nanoant/WebFrameworkBenchmark.git > which is really a very simple benchmark but it shows about the > general overhead. > > single core results against go-fasthttp with GOMAXPROCS=1 and > vibe distribution disabled on a c4.2xlarge ec2 instance > (archlinux): > > vibe.d 0.7.23 with ldc > Requests/sec: 52102.06 > > vibe.d 0.7.26 with dmd > Requests/sec: 44438.47 > > vibe.d 0.7.26 with ldc > Requests/sec: 53996.62 > > go-fasthttp: > Requests/sec: 152573.32 > > go: > Requests/sec: 62310.04 > > its sad. > > i am aware that go-fasthttp is a very simplistic, stripped down > webserver and vibe is almost a full blown framework. still it > should be D and vibe.d's USP to be faster than the fastest in the > world and not limping around at the end of the charts. > > Which async library you use for vibed? libevent? libev? or libasync? Which compilation switches you used? Without this info it says nothing about vibe.d's performance :)
