On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 12:44:37 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
V Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:26:12 +0000
yawniek via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> napsáno:
obvious typo and thanks for investigating etienne.
@daniel: i made similar results over the network.
i want to redo them with a more optimized setup though. my wrk
server was too weak.
the local results are still relevant as its a common setup to
have nginx distribute to a few vibe instances locally.
One thing I forgot to mention I have to modify few things
vibe.d has (probably) bug it use threadPerCPU instead of
corePerCPU in setupWorkerThreads, here is a commit which make
possible to setup it by hand.
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/commit/f946c3a840eab4ef5f7b98906a6eb143509e1447
(I just modify vibe.d code to use all my 4 cores and it helps a
lot)
can someone tell me what changes need to be commited, so that we
have a chance at getting some decent (or even average) benchmark
numbers ?
