Re: Pseudo-random numbers in [0, n), covering all numbers in n steps?

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 02/26/2016 03:05 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
I can probably find the PRs if you want to see the context.

I understand the motivation behind that statement, and am not worried 
about pointing fingers etc. Would be great if a new PR removed the text. 
-- Andrei