Re: Pseudo-random numbers in [0, n), covering all numbers in n steps?

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 26 February 2016 at 12:21:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
On 02/26/2016 03:05 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
I can probably find the PRs if you want to see the context.

I understand the motivation behind that statement, and am not 
worried about pointing fingers etc. Would be great if a new PR 
removed the text. -- Andrei

Done. :-)