On Monday, 9 May 2016 at 05:00:31 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 09/05/2016 4:50 PM, Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
It seems to me, that std.experimental.allocator should work with @nogc annotated functions if none of the allocators being used are the gcallocator, though it's not at all clear to me how this would work.

Are there plans for this?

If only we had @assumenogc ala @safe's @trusted but for @nogc we could definitely do it then.

I think you've been misleaded by the initial Q that spuriously assumes that allocators are not @nogc but @nogc allocators seems to be a milestone that's in our back now.

Reply via email to