On Monday, 9 May 2016 at 05:00:31 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 09/05/2016 4:50 PM, Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
It seems to me, that std.experimental.allocator should work
with @nogc
annotated functions if none of the allocators being used are
the
gcallocator, though it's not at all clear to me how this would
work.
Are there plans for this?
If only we had @assumenogc ala @safe's @trusted but for @nogc
we could definitely do it then.
I think you've been misleaded by the initial Q that spuriously
assumes that allocators are not @nogc but @nogc allocators seems
to be a milestone that's in our back now.