On 09/05/2016 5:16 PM, Hildigard Sandyman wrote:
On Monday, 9 May 2016 at 05:00:31 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 09/05/2016 4:50 PM, Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
It seems to me, that std.experimental.allocator should work with @nogc
annotated functions if none of the allocators being used are the
gcallocator, though it's not at all clear to me how this would work.
Are there plans for this?
If only we had @assumenogc ala @safe's @trusted but for @nogc we could
definitely do it then.
I think you've been misleaded by the initial Q that spuriously assumes
that allocators are not @nogc but @nogc allocators seems to be a
milestone that's in our back now.
All I know is that until IAllocator can be @nogc, we can't use
theAllocator + processAllocator. Which kinda requires @assumenogc for
the GC allocator.
