On Monday, 9 May 2016 at 10:33:27 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
I've done windowing and image libraries before.
You are correct, you do not need OOP.

But if you want to keep implementation nicely separated out from usage, you really do. Which is a major part of my requirements.

Well, in my example above, everything is nicely separated, easy to use, yet quite flexible. And still there is no Java-style OOP. Do you have any examples, where the use of classic OOP would provide a strictly superior design?

Reply via email to