Re: How about a special null template parameter?

[Jack Applegame via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 19 August 2016 at 18:25:06 UTC, Engine Machine wrote:
It replaces the current method of having to define a 
non-templated class and a templated class.

e.g.,

class Type
{
   int x;
}

class Type(T) : Type
{
   static if (T is Dog)
      int y;
}
What are you talking about? This code doesn't compile. Because 
you can't define a class and a template with the same name.