On Friday, 30 September 2016 at 13:37:43 UTC, Meta wrote:

This suggestion has come up before but Andrei is against it.

https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/3615

It brings a tear to my eye.

Ah that's a shame, would like to reopen that conversation. Is there any way to ping him on the forums. I can see his case for not wanting "[$]" arrays, but I feel it's a different case for pointers.


Andralex on github:
Complicates the language without a corresponding increase in power

I'd say it increases readability and maintainability, that may not be an increase in "power" (what does that even mean) but I'd argue maintainability and readability are more important than "power". When you see "auto" you can't infer any information about it making it harder to read code. Adding some extra information to it can make it more readable at a glance.

Small obscure feature of dubious usefulness that creates a precedent for other small obscure features of increasingly dubious usefulness

This functionality already exists in function form as seen below. So the foot is already in the door, it's a matter adding the functionality to auto declarations, for completeness and such ;).

How about accepting stuff like that in function parameters, etc? It's easy to argue that on grounds of completeness, now that there's a foot in the door.

Ref as well. The functionality of reference is almost exactly a partial type specification. As in C++ a reference is denoted by "&", when you look at the implementaiton in C++ they are almost exactly the same.

for(auto* v : args);
for(auto& v : args);

So the functionality already exists as a reference as well. It exists in a function parameter as well as in a foreach statement. Basically everywhere that you made the argument against the feature, as it could extend to those areas as well. The only place "ref" doesn't exist in D is when specifying a variable. Otherwise it's almost exactly the same feature.



    import std.stdio;

void test(T)(T* t) // functionality already exists in function form
    {
        writeln(T.stringof);
    }

    void main()
    {
        int* p;

        test(p);
        // test(10); // error won't compile this

foreach(ref v ; 0 .. 10) // basically equivalent to C++: for(auto& v : arr)
        {
        }
    }

Reply via email to