On 19 October 2016 at 06:22, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 04:15 PM, Atila Neves wrote: > >> >> I think I get it; I'm just not sure given the comments that pop up in >> the forum. Isn't one of the main reasons distinguishing between these two? >> >> void fun(ref const Foo); >> void fun(Foo); >> >> If they can't be distinguished, you don't get move semantics "for free". >> > > That's right, thanks Atila. -- Andreu > This is obvious though, lval calls the first, rval calls the second. Surely most programmers would intuitively expect that behaviour? Is there some issue there?
