On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 15:49 -0800, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: > […] > > Anyone who wants to use ldc can use ldc. It doesn't need to be the > reference > compiler for that. And unlike gdc, it's actually pretty close to dmd. > So, > there should be no problem with folks using ldc for production right > now if > they want to.
Strikes me that the really obvious thing to say is that DMD is the playground where whoever wants to can play with and progress the D front end in the knowledge that no-one is going to use DMD in production. People use LDC in production because it is the right thing to do: stable proven front end, stable proven backend, and yet up to date. What is not to like here? What is the problem here? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
