On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 03:44 +1300, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d wrote: > […] > > Except dmd's backend is far more well proven then LLVM is.
Come now that is obfuscation – you need to make good on this claim. The LLVM backend has many, many more users than the DMD backend and the LLVM backend is used with many more different languages than the DMD backend. The LLVM backend is proven far more than the DMD backend simply on the basis of statistical likelihood. I'll back LLVM any day in this argument. > So that argument needs to be tweaked a little bit. No it doesn't, it stands as stated. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
