On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:59:40 -0800, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: > dmd compiles code faster, which is better from a development standpoint. > Assuming that dmd and ldc are compatible enough, it makes a lot of sense > to do most of the development with dmd and produce the actual product > with ldc.
You'll want your CI server to build with both thanks to ABI incompatibilities. That way, if I depend on a library that you wrote, I can grab an official build from the CI server that's ABI-compatible with DMD. Or do everything from source.
