Justin Johansson wrote: > Great. Sounds like problem solved in that there is no problem. > > So how do people feel about bill's suggestion to progress the issue > further? > > Be good to get some comments from higher-up (Walter, Andrei)? > > Predict bearophile will chime in on this one too?
The real problem is you'd end up with a tuple syntax identical to a valid c syntax. If D silently accepts it, but does something different, it's a no go.
