Ellery Newcomer, el 16 de noviembre a las 19:02 me escribiste: > Justin Johansson wrote: > > > Great. Sounds like problem solved in that there is no problem. > > > > So how do people feel about bill's suggestion to progress the issue > > further? > > > > Be good to get some comments from higher-up (Walter, Andrei)? > > > > Predict bearophile will chime in on this one too? > > The real problem is you'd end up with a tuple syntax identical to a > valid c syntax. If D silently accepts it, but does something different, > it's a no go.
Code ported from C should not compile if the comma expression is converted to a tuple literal because if a and b are int, typeof(a,b) is int now and will be Tuple!(int, int) in the future, and I don't think a Tuple!(anything) could be implicitly casted to anything, except, maybe, another tuple, but you don't have tuples in C, so there is no risk on that. -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I always get the feeling that when lesbians look at me, they're thinking, '*That's* why I'm not a heterosexual.' -- George Constanza
