Leandro Lucarella wrote: > Ellery Newcomer, el 16 de noviembre a las 19:02 me escribiste: >> Justin Johansson wrote: >> >>> Great. Sounds like problem solved in that there is no problem. >>> >>> So how do people feel about bill's suggestion to progress the issue >>> further? >>> >>> Be good to get some comments from higher-up (Walter, Andrei)? >>> >>> Predict bearophile will chime in on this one too? >> The real problem is you'd end up with a tuple syntax identical to a >> valid c syntax. If D silently accepts it, but does something different, >> it's a no go. > > Code ported from C should not compile if the comma expression is converted > to a tuple literal because if a and b are int, typeof(a,b) is int now and > will be Tuple!(int, int) in the future, and I don't think > a Tuple!(anything) could be implicitly casted to anything, except, maybe, > another tuple, but you don't have tuples in C, so there is no risk on that. >
void fun1(int a); void fun1(Tuple!(int,int) a); fun1( (a=fizbang(), a+b) );
