On 10 May 2017 at 22:04, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 19:46:01 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: >> >> Ironically, given that I'd always been worried this would be the most >> finnicky compiler snap to create, it's actually the simplest package >> definition out of all the Big 3 ;-) > > > Without even having seen your snap file, I can confidently say that this is > just due to the idiosyncrasies of the snap environment, though. > > Oh wait, no, GDC is still stuck on an ancient C++-based frontend. Not too > surprising, then. ;P > > — David
I can only infer that you are saying that using a D project means it's more difficult to get working with snap. To which I will insert an obligatory "Woah!", and "I expect you to know better" rebuttal. ... Woah, I expect you to know better. Iain.
