Liam McGillivray wrote:

I feel like D3 would see significantly wider adoption than D2 ever got, as long as it successfully solves the problems of D2.

..and it actually should be D1.5, not D3. ;-) 'cause D3 implies even more features, and i feel that the way to get The Perfect D (sorry! ;-) is trying to cut all the features that aren't strictly necessary (including fat-free stdlib too: i see stdlib as a part of the language).

Reply via email to