On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 08:06:54 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2017-06-17 at 12:20 -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
It's highly unlikely it would be accepted:
So it is highly unlikely I am going to offer to do any work on
it then.
If you can present a replacement build infrastructure for D which
satisfies our needs and shows dramatic, measurable improvements,
I (and other contributors, I don't doubt) will help push it
through.
I'm writing this post just as I'm running a bisection to find out
what broke DMD's win64.mak makefile again.
