On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 09:24:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't propose ignoring it, but I suggest not to invest too much more into it, like all the work it would take to get VS or other Windows IDE support up to the level where Windows devs seem to want.
I'm not sure how much work that would take, TBH, but I think that this is perhaps a better way to phrase your concerns. Saying that people working on Windows IDEs are wasting their time is probably not going to convince them of your point of view. Rather the argument that investing X hours in improving IDE would be better spent investing it in Y other D project is a much less inflammatory point. Granted, I think people could quibble with this, but it wouldn't drive me nuts to hear it.
