On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:34:48 +0000, Benny wrote: > https://crates.io/categories
Thanks. I wish that was easier to find though. I still don't see how to get there without knowing it already exists. > The issue is that a lot of D's packages are even less maintained then > Rust, mostly because Rust being newer and attracting more active crowds. > And it does not help when Dmd having constant deprecating functions and > regressions ( what happens WAY too often ) that break packages. > > Its a long term weakness. Depending on 3th party packages is always > dangerous but even more so when the compiler forces people to use older > versions, just to stay safe. Yeah, I'm not sure how cruft should be handled; maybe move anything that hasn't had a single commit in 4 years to an Archive category which is hidden by default... at the rate D changes, even the simplest libraries that haven't been touched in four years likely have a deprecation or error to handle (or documentation that could be improved), and if the registry could create an issue as a warning first, nobody should be surprised by their project being archived. I wonder if the Dub registry could read a CI configuration file to grab the tested D compilers in a repo, and display them on the package's page as supported compilers. I don't know if people would interpret that to imply that the package is incompatible with anything not listed though.
