On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 19:20:14 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 17:02:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 14:48:04 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
That is not a runtime version of system/user attributes! That
is custom checking for destructor! Hardly the same.
How would your idea work?
I thought it was your idea.
Classes in fact do not work with -betterC.
https://dlang.org/spec/betterc.html#consequences
"C++ classes and COM classes will still work"
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/08/23/d-as-a-better-c/
A bit misleading in that statement. It should be "D Classes".
No D classes requires D TypeInfo, not available in BetterC.
It's well C++ classes ;)
Warning: your code is fundamentally broken and cannot work the
way you want it to work.
I can tell that you're being snarky at me.
