On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 21:49:57 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 14/07/2018 9:28 AM, Manu wrote:
I've already contributed other points to this DIP in the way
you describe.
This one however is very strange, and I'm surprised you can
find the
hand-wavy introduction of a new attribute without any sense of
where
it's going to be okay. Or maybe, I'm surprised I'm the only
one that
finds problem with that.
You are very much not alone.
I didn't articulate it very clearly, but I am super not happy
with such a new attribute.
I'm not crazy about it either, but it may be a necessary evil to
avoid breaking code (although it doesn't entirely avoid that, as
has been demonstrated).
