On Sat., 14 Jul. 2018, 2:00 am rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d, < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 14/07/2018 1:04 PM, Manu wrote: > > Determining that requires at least a cursory exploration. > > Given how many of us are objecting to the syntax, I'm going to place > this requirement upon a 'yes' answer by me. That an attempt is made for > an alternative syntax discussion. It's a fair request I think. > I just want to reiterate again, I'm not seeking alternative syntax, I just want to know that proposed syntax can work broadly, or if there are any challenges or problems that would restrict it from broad application. >
