On 7/16/18 3:12 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 07/16/2018 09:06 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/14/18 11:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[...]
That's easily fixed by implementing a compiler recognized UDA. That
would mean that it would only be a copy constructor if "implicit" is
defined in core.attribute. This would also avoid any special syntax
in the parser. The already existing @selector is implemented like this.
Affirmative. We're going that route, similar to "@safe" and "@nogc".
@safe and @nogc are not compiler recognized UDAs. If you implement
@implicit like them, then you're not doing what Jacob suggests.
Then "negative" :o). In brief @implicit follows the same implementation
as @safe and @nogc/
