On 9/15/18 6:29 PM, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 20:07:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Looks pretty good to me. The only question I have is on this part:
enum YesNo : bool { no, yes } // Existing implementation: OK
// After stage 1: Deprecation warning
// After stage 2: Error
// Remedy: `enum YesNo : bool { no =
false, yes = true }`
Why is this necessary? I can't see how there are integer literals
being used here, or how implicitly going from `false` to `true` in the
2 items being enumerated is going to be confusing.
You're right, I just tested the implementation, and this is not
necessary. I'll remove it. Thanks!
Then I have no objections, looks like a nice positive change to me!
-Steve
