On 22/09/18 14:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
As I said, it's exactly the same as arguing that words should be represented in Unicode. Unfortunately, however, at least some of them are in there. :|- Jonathan M Davis
To be fair to them, that word is part of the "Arabic-representation forms" section. The "Presentation forms" sections are meant as backwards compatibility toward code points that existed before, and are not meant to be generated by Unicode aware applications.
Shachar
