On 5/27/11, Matthew Ong <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/operatoroverloading.html # people done > C++ can understand others may not.
Well, explaining the concept of operator overloading should be a separate topic. People who know what operator overloading is will look in the language docs to figure out the syntax and use it right away. Doesn't Java have operator overloading? A lot of popular languages except maybe C have it, I think. > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/template-mixin.html This could definitely be improved. There's too much foo's and bar's intertwined with mixins. > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/traits.html Not sure what's wrong here. > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/statement.html#ScopeGuardStatement I think the point of those numbers was to make it easy to figure out which statements were executed in sequence. It doesn't demonstrate where you would need a scope guard, so maybe another example could be added or these ones rewritten a little bit.
