On 5/28/2011 1:24 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-05-27 06:31, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
LOL. Yeah. Java will never have operator overloading. That would be on the
list of features that were considered unsafe. And I know plenty of folks who
are against operator overloading for similar reasons. Java has a lot of great
stuff going for it, but it's overly stripped down in terms of features in the
name of simplicity and safety, and operator overloading is definitely one of
those that didn't make it in and never will. IIRC, they can't even get
closures yet, even though it's the feature that's being pushed for the most
and the Java folks were at least planning on implementing it. They'll never
get operator overloading.
- Jonathan M Davis
I remember if I am not wrong, C++ can do operator overloading and also
overriding operator that also at child class. Sounded cool, but the more...
you heard that before haven't you... :)
>closures yet
Semi-correct, Not within the standard syntax. But available also.
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/java/lambdajclosure.aspx
Does D have? Perhaps someone may give some URL
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inversion_of_control
Along side with spring framework?? That allow classes to be late binded
via configuration in xml file.
Implementation techniques
1. using a factory pattern
2. using a service locator pattern
3. using a constructor injection
4. using a setter injection
5. using an interface injection
6. using a contextualized lookup
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect-oriented_programming
using http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AspectJ
There are many many extension because I think the bytecode allow such
manipulations and not limited to the standard syntax of Java.
Perhaps something similar can be done with the Object file in D. :)
Yes... I am still a coffee(Java) addict. Sorry cannot stop that. Addict.
May need to take some 12 steps program... :)
--
Matthew Ong
email: [email protected]
