On 6/20/2011 11:04 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/20/11 10:02 AM, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu ([email protected])'s
article
On 6/19/11 6:20 PM, dsimcha wrote:
My other concern is that giving RegionAllocator reference semantics
would, IIUC, require an allocation to allocate a RegionAllocator. Since
TempAlloc is designed to avoid global GC locks/world stopping like the
plauge, this is obviously bad.
I am hoping we can arrange things such that a RegionAllocator created
from scratch initializes a new frame, whereas subsequent copies of it
use that same frame. Would that work?
Andrei
No. I don't want every creation of a new frame to require a GC heap
allocation.
I don't understand why such would be necessary.
Andrei
Maybe I'm missing something, but how else would a RegionAllocator have
reference semantics?
