On 2011-09-01 16:14, David Nadlinger wrote:
I agree on both points: Now that it looks like we are settling for a common allocator interface (Andrei, keep your ideas and comments coming, at least I find them very interesting ;)), a package for various implementations seems like a good idea to me.
I think that there should be a package for allocators.
And yes, all names should be regarded provisional unless the functionality in question is merged in – Jonas will probably rename etc.curl to std.curl as well, but still we need a handle for it during the review process. David
BTW, shouldn't std/etc.curl be std.net.curl now when we have a std.net package.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
