On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:56:59 +0200, Gor Gyolchanyan
<[email protected]> wrote:
Unless you write a template constraint, this will force you to use the
same type, instead of the same storage class.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:42 PM, so <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:39:35 +0200, so <[email protected]> wrote:
auto fun(return(type) a, ...)
return(T) fun(return(S) a, ...)
Damn, nobody likes it, and i was expecting at least a nobel prize on
math.
return(T) fun(return(S) a, ...)
Functions just like inout right now, and with:
auto fun(return(type) a, ...)
I meant to suggest if not said otherwise (as in the case above) we can
just go return what it was passed.
(I am not sure, probably inout already does this too)
