On 08-11-2011 15:02, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Well use of auto can be ambiguous here I think.
I'm not sure, frankly. We should consult with Walter and co. because
they have a better idea about syntax readability.
I know I wouldn't enjoy typing three keywords on a single parameter. :)
What about auto const ref ?
That will force you to have both auto const and auto ref at the same time.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 5:48 PM, deadalnix<[email protected]> wrote:
Le 08/11/2011 14:36, Gor Gyolchanyan a écrit :
I agree with _inout_ being a bad choice.
I'd rather use something involving _auto_, because this kind of use of
_auto_ is already employed in _auto ref_ parameters and is visually
unambiguous.
Probably _auto const_ would do the trick.
The actual _inout_ keyword could be flagged as deprecated and removed
during the next breaking change in D (along with all other wonderful
breaking changes that were proposed).
Well use of auto can be ambiguous here I think.
What about auto const ref ?
- Alex
