On 12/12/2011 12:23 AM, Simen Kjærås wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:46:15 +0100, bearophile
<[email protected]> wrote:

46 + auto (i, j) = 10;
47 + assert(i == 10);
48 + assert(j == 10);

Yeah, this is not good. Also, didn't we settle for (auto i, j)?

AFAIK the patch implements both, and I think that is the way it should be.

Reply via email to