On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:31:29 +0100, Timon Gehr <[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/12/2011 12:23 AM, Simen Kjærås wrote:On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:46:15 +0100, bearophile <[email protected]> wrote:46 + auto (i, j) = 10; 47 + assert(i == 10); 48 + assert(j == 10);Yeah, this is not good. Also, didn't we settle for (auto i, j)?AFAIK the patch implements both, and I think that is the way it should be.
As do I, but I think (auto i, j) is the most important of the two.
