On Thursday, 10 May 2012 at 14:33:32 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
On Thursday, 10 May 2012 at 14:11:32 UTC, Mafi wrote:Yes! That's, like, 80 fewer characters... And it doesn't scale with multiple optional arguments..Am 10.05.2012 02:16, schrieb Mehrdad:Is this possible/should it compile?If not, should I make an enhancement request for it? It's been somethingthat would've been useful in a ton of situations for me...
er, more* characters
